On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 03:05:21PM +0530, Akash Asthana wrote: > We are taking care of actual throughput requirement in avg_bw vote and the > intention of putting peak as twice of avg is to ensure that if high speed > peripherals(ex:USB) removes their votes, we shouldn't see any latency issue > because of other ICC client who don't vote for their BW requirement or > *actual* BW requirement. Factor of 2 is chosen randomly. Please > correct/improve me if this is not okay. > If this is okay, I will centralize this design for SPI QUP, I2C and UART > driver. That seems reasonable to me, it was just the fact that every driver seemed to be doing the same thing that I was noticing - what was being done seemed OK.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
