Hi Tomasz, On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Arun, Alim, > > On 09.05.2014 14:25, Arun Kumar K wrote: >> From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Exynos5800 clock structure is mostly similar to 5420 with only >> a small delta changes. So the 5420 clock file is re-used for >> 5800 also. The common clocks for both are seggreagated and few >> clocks which are different for both are separately initialized. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Changes from v1 >> --------------- >> - Rebased on clock cleanup by Shaik > > This still isn't using correct base and won't compile with current > sources, even if it applies fine. This is partially my fault as we had a > lot of issues with cross-tree dependencies and it was not clear what to > base clock patches on, but I'll try to keep samsung-clk-next branch of > samsung-clk [1] tree up to date, so it should be safe to base on. > > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git Ok I will rebase the 5800 clock patch on this branch and resend it. Thanks & Regards Arun > > Best regards, > Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
