On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 07:56:51AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:48 AM <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Indeed there are a log of trivial devices amongst platform controllers, > > IP-blocks, etc. If they satisfy the trivial devices bindings requirements > > like consisting of a compatible field, an address and possibly an interrupt > > line why not having them in the generic trivial-devices bindings file? > > NAK. > > Do you have some documentation on what a platform bus is? Last I > checked, that's a Linux thing. > > If anything, we'd move toward getting rid of trivial-devices.yaml. For > example, I'd like to start defining the node name which wouldn't work > for trivial-devices.yaml unless we split by class. > > Rob Hello Rob, Understood. I thought the trivial-devices bindings was to collect all the devices with simple bindings, but it turns out to be a stub for devices, which just aren't described by a dedicated bindings file. I'll resubmit the v2 version with no changes to the trivial-devices.yaml, but with CDMM/CPC dt-nodes having yaml-based bindings. Regards, -Sergey
