On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:48 AM <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Indeed there are a log of trivial devices amongst platform controllers, > IP-blocks, etc. If they satisfy the trivial devices bindings requirements > like consisting of a compatible field, an address and possibly an interrupt > line why not having them in the generic trivial-devices bindings file? NAK. Do you have some documentation on what a platform bus is? Last I checked, that's a Linux thing. If anything, we'd move toward getting rid of trivial-devices.yaml. For example, I'd like to start defining the node name which wouldn't work for trivial-devices.yaml unless we split by class. Rob
