On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14 May 2014 11:39, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I agree with Nishanth here, that point 1 (as described by Viresh at >> [*]) is a more scalable approach. > > The only reason why I wanted all that to be done at OPP level was to > ensure if somebody else also needs it apart from cpufreq, they don't have > to duplicate code and find it.. As it is present at a central place.. > > But if no other code is going to look for that, it may just be fine as is.. Yes, I agree with Nishanth and Lukasz for a separate binding. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
