On 14 May 2014 11:39, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree with Nishanth here, that point 1 (as described by Viresh at > [*]) is a more scalable approach. The only reason why I wanted all that to be done at OPP level was to ensure if somebody else also needs it apart from cpufreq, they don't have to duplicate code and find it.. As it is present at a central place.. But if no other code is going to look for that, it may just be fine as is.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
