On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 07:56, Chun-Hung Wu <chun-hung.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Expose MMC_CAP2_CQE and MMC_CAP2_CQE_DCMD
> to host->caps2 if
> 1. "supports-cqe" is defined in dt and
> 2. "disable-cqe-dcmd" is not defined in dt.
Both of these DT properties are defined as common mmc DT properties,
so the above isn't really correct. Please clarify this.
Moreover, I suggest to update commit message header into "mmc: core:
Extend mmc_of_parse() to parse CQE bindings", as I think it better
describes the change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Wu <chun-hung.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> index 105b7a7..efb0dbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,14 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
> host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_NO_SD;
> if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "no-mmc"))
> host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_NO_MMC;
> + if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "supports-cqe"))
> + host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CQE;
> +
> + /* Must be after "supports-cqe" check */
> + if (!device_property_read_bool(dev, "disable-cqe-dcmd")) {
> + if (host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE)
Does it really doesn't matter if we set this cap, even if MMC_CAP2_CQE
isn't set? You can probably skip the check above.
> + host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CQE_DCMD;
> + }
>
> /* Must be after "non-removable" check */
> if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "fixed-emmc-driver-type", &drv_type) == 0) {
> --
> 1.9.1
Kind regards
Uffe
