On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 06:57:59PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Dajun
>
> > This is my test in Xilinx zcu106 board.
> >
> > dts is liks this:
> > ethernet@ff0e0000 {
> > compatible = "cdns,zynqmp-gem", "cdns,gem";
> > status = "okay";
> > ...
> >
> > phy@0 {
> > ti,rx-internal-delay = <0x8>;
> > ti,tx-internal-delay = <0xa>;
> > ti,fifo-depth = <0x1>;
> > ti,rxctrl-strap-worka;
> > linux,phandle = <0x12>;
> > phandle = <0x12>;
Isn't dtc going to complain about this? The node name has an address,
but there's no reg property. If there's no reg property, shouldn't it
be just "phy" ?
The above doesn't look like the original .dts file itself either, but
a .dtb translated back to a .dts - note the numeric phandle properties
and presence of "linux,phandle".
ethernet-phy.yaml also says:
required:
- reg
so arguably the above doesn't conform to what we expect?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
