Hello Mark, On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 11:53 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:36:10AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > Rename the "regulator_linear_range" to more generic linear_range > > as a first step towards converting the "regulator_linear_range" > > to common helpers. > > Doesn't this introduce a build break when applied by itself? Patches > should be bisectable, if you want to split things up you should > introduce the new API then use it. Uh, I need to double check but this shouldn't cause build break as only the name of the struct is changed - and I intended to change it both in regulator header and in all of the drivers using it at same time. Or did I do some brainfart here? I just wanted to minimize the changes in patch with the widest audience. Oh, after rebasing to linux 5.6-rc2 I see that there are few new users of regulator_linear_range (I should have known that...) - natuarlly all of the users need to be covered before applying this. Br, Matti Vaittinen
