Hi,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:27:36AM +0100, agriveaux@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Alexandre GRIVEAUX <agriveaux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add Inet 86V Rev 2 support, based upon Inet 86VS.
>
> Missing things:
> - Accelerometer (MXC6225X)
> - Touchpanel (Sitronix SL1536)
> - Nand (29F32G08CBACA)
> - Camera (HCWY0308)
Same thing than for U-Boot, you're missing your SoB.
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-inet-86v-rev2.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-inet-86v-rev2.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-inet-86v-rev2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-inet-86v-rev2.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e73abb9a1e32
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-inet-86v-rev2.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2020 Alexandre Griveaux <agriveaux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * Minimal dts file for the iNet 86V
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "sun5i-a13.dtsi"
> +#include "sun5i-reference-design-tablet.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "iNET 86V Rev 02";
> + compatible = "inet,86v-rev2", "allwinner,sun5i-a13";
> +
> +};
If it's exactly the same device, why do we need another device tree?
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
