The last example in qcom,gcc.yaml set 'sleep' as the second
value of 'clock-names'. According to the schema is should
be 'sleep_clk'. Fix the example to conform the schema.
This fixes a warning when validating the schema:
"clock-names: ... is not valid under any of the given schemas"
Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I tested this patch on top of the patch
"dt-binding: fix compilation error of the example in qcom,gcc.yaml"
which fixes a compilation error in this file
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
index 50ff07f80acb..cac1150c9292 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ examples:
<0>,
<0>;
clock-names = "xo",
- "sleep",
+ "sleep_clk",
"usb3_pipe",
"ufs_rx_symbol0",
"ufs_rx_symbol1",
--
2.17.1
