On 1/5/20 2:58 AM, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
Extend "vrm_version" with support for Intel IMVP9 specification.
Signed-off-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h | 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
index 2bdebd0ea9c1..c6b2401f1c6c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ enum pmbus_sensor_classes {
#define PMBUS_PAGE_VIRTUAL BIT(31)
enum pmbus_data_format { linear = 0, direct, vid };
-enum vrm_version { vr11 = 0, vr12, vr13 };
+enum vrm_version { vr11 = 0, vr12, vr13, imvp9 };
struct pmbus_driver_info {
int pages; /* Total number of pages */
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
index 98226e84b351..a9b7b555cf6e 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
@@ -709,6 +709,10 @@ static long pmbus_reg2data_vid(struct pmbus_data *data,
if (val >= 0x01)
rv = 500 + (val - 1) * 10;
break;
+ case imvp9:
+ if (val >= 0x01)
+ rv = 200 + (val - 1) * 10;
+ break;
There is also Intel VR14, and there is some indication that it is identical
to imvp9. If that is the case, I would prefer to use existing terminology.
Unfortunately, Intel is a bit close-lipped about both. If you have access
to documentation, can you check ?
Thanks,
Guenter
}
return rv;
}
