On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 06:57:12AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Forward declarations are considered bad. > > Not by me! Lets see what David says. > > For the moment what you have is sufficient. I doubt anybody is using > > the dp83640 with phylink, and the new hardware you are targeting seems > > to be RGMII based, not SERDES, which is the main use case for PHYLINK. > > Yeah, my impression is that the phyter will be the first and last phy > time stamping device ever created. Designers reject this part because > it is 100 mbit only. And there are no gigabit+ phys with time > stamping at all. The Marvell PHY datasheets indicate they support PTP. I've not looked at how they implement it, and if the current model will work. Andrew
