On Tue, 06 May 2014 20:08:47 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 06.05.2014 19:59, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote: > >> This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here > >> doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new versions > >> very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and > >> again is quite a hard job. > >> > >> If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of > >> above patches, > >> which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't depend on > >> DT bindings are already tested, I hope merging these subset of patches may help > >> in reducing the rework and review effort every time. > >> > >> Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver > >> can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind. > > > > Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When > > Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the > > dt-independend parts. > > +1. > > I would also suggest dropping patch 18/31, for the reasons I mentioned > in my reply to it. > Great. We will prepare the next patch series that are independent upon DT bindings soon. Thank you. KyongHo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
