On Tuesday 06 May 2014 19:59:05 Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote: > > This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here > > doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new versions > > very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and > > again is quite a hard job. > > > > If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of > > above patches, > > which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't depend on > > DT bindings are already tested, I hope merging these subset of patches may help > > in reducing the rework and review effort every time. > > > > Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver > > can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind. > > Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When > Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the > dt-independend parts. Sounds good to me. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
