On 17 December 2019 06:40, Marco Felsch wrote: > On 19-12-16 11:33, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 8:47 AM Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > Nice catch, Linus is it okay to add this as follow up patch? The current > > > patch isn't wrong without the 'PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE' case. > > > > No strong opinion on that as long as the result is running code. > > Of course the code is running and was tested. Just didn't covered this > use case. > > Adam is this okay with you? If you want to send a follow up straight after then that's ok although to me that seems like more effort. :) Anyway: Reviewed-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Regards, > Marco > > > Yours, > > Linus Walleij > >
