On 19-12-16 11:33, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 8:47 AM Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Nice catch, Linus is it okay to add this as follow up patch? The current > > patch isn't wrong without the 'PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE' case. > > No strong opinion on that as long as the result is running code. Of course the code is running and was tested. Just didn't covered this use case. Adam is this okay with you? Regards, Marco > Yours, > Linus Walleij >
