Hi Heiko. > > The idea was that if a write returned an error then do not even attempt > > more writes. So if a write fails we do not loose the original error > > code, assuming subsequent write would also fail. > > Shouldn't the code above do exactly that? ... Because it's like > > ret = dcs_write(...) > if (ret <0) > return ret; > > So if any of the dcs_writes goes wrong it should just return the > error code from that write from the function and not try any more > writes. (or I'm blind and do not see something ;-) ) You are right, the code does it already. Sam
