Hi Sam, thanks for the thorough review :-) Am Samstag, 14. Dezember 2019, 09:17:30 CET schrieb Sam Ravnborg: > > +#define dsi_generic_write_seq(dsi, cmd, seq...) do { \ > > + static const u8 d[] = { seq }; \ > > + int ret; \ > > + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi, cmd, d, ARRAY_SIZE(d)); \ > > + if (ret < 0) \ > > + return ret; \ > > + } while (0) > This macro return an error code if a write fails. > > > + > > +static int xpp055c272_init_sequence(struct xpp055c272 *ctx) > > +{ > > + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev); > > + struct device *dev = ctx->dev; > > + int ret; > > + > > + /* > > + * Init sequence was supplied by the panel vendor without much > > + * documentation. > > + */ > > + dsi_generic_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEXTC, 0xf1, 0x12, 0x83); > But all uses of the macro here ignore the error. hmm, am I way off track here? dsi_generic_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEXTC, 0xf1, 0x12, 0x83); dsi_generic_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETMIPI, 0x33, 0x81, 0x05, 0xf9, 0x0e, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x44, 0x25, 0x00, 0x91, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x4f, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x37); ... should just expand to do { static const u8 d[] = { 0xf1, 0x12, 0x83 }; int ret; ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEXTC, d, ARRAY_SIZE(d)); if (ret < 0) return ret; } while (0) do { static const u8 d[] = { 0x33, 0x81, 0x05, 0xf9, 0x0e, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x44, 0x25, 0x00, 0x91, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x4f, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x37 }; int ret; ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETMIPI, d, ARRAY_SIZE(d)); if (ret < 0) return ret; } while (0) ... so every write instance will actually return an error if it happens and not continue on with the next init item. Or I'm not thinking correctly at 0:07 ;-) Heiko