On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 04:06:21PM +0100, Guillaume La Roque wrote: > add interrupts and interrupt-names as optional properties > to support host-wakeup by interrupt properties instead of > host-wakeup-gpios. > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt > index b5eadee4a9a7..95912d979239 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt > @@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ Optional properties: > - pcm-frame-type: short, long > - pcm-sync-mode: slave, master > - pcm-clock-mode: slave, master > - > + - interrupts: must be one, used to wakeup the host processor if > + gpiod_to_irq function not supported This is a Linux implementation detail which therefore doesn't belong in the binding. I think the general rule is to prefer interrupts over gpios where we have a choice, but here the current binding already has a host-wakeup-gpios. Not sure how best to handle that, maybe Rob knows. > + - interrupt-names: must be "host-wakeup" > > Example: Oh, and please keep people commenting on your patches on CC when you submit new versions. Johan