Hi Kuldeep,
Am 2019-11-26 07:40, schrieb Kuldeep Singh:
Hi Michael,
-----Original Message-----
From: devicetree-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<devicetree-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Michael Walle
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2019 1:43 AM
To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
linux-
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Rob
Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>;
Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXT] [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: ls1028a: add FlexSPI node
There's already a patch[1] sent upstream and is under review.
It includes dts(i) entries for LS1028. I will be sending the next
version
I've seen that, but there wasn't any reply for almost two months now.
But
if you're sending your next version, this patch can be dropped from this
series.
-michael
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11139365/
Caution: EXT Email
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
index 6730922c2d47..650b277ddd66 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
@@ -260,6 +260,19 @@
status = "disabled";
};
+ fspi: spi@20c0000 {
+ compatible = "nxp,lx2160a-fspi";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x0 0x20c0000 0x0 0x10000>,
+ <0x0 0x20000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
+ reg-names = "fspi_base", "fspi_mmap";
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ clocks = <&clockgen 4 3>, <&clockgen 4 3>;
+ clock-names = "fspi_en", "fspi";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
esdhc: mmc@2140000 {
compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-esdhc", "fsl,esdhc";
reg = <0x0 0x2140000 0x0 0x10000>;
--
2.20.1
Regards
Kuldeep
