Re: [PATCH v10 03/14] media: v4l2-fwnode: add initial connector parsing support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sakari,

sorry for my delay now ^^

On 19-10-24 15:02, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> > 
> > On 19-10-23 13:57, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi Marco,
> > > 
> > > Apologies for the delay.
> > 
> > No problem.
> > 
> > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > > Hi Sakari,
> > > > 
> > > > On 19-10-02 10:03, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > > Hi Marco,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:16:35PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > > > > The patch adds the initial connector parsing code, so we can move from a
> > > > > > driver specific parsing code to a generic one. Currently only the
> > > > > > generic fields and the analog-connector specific fields are parsed. Parsing
> > > > > > the other connector specific fields can be added by a simple callbacks.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10794703/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v10:
> > > > > > - drop V4L2_CONN_HDMI support
> > > > > > - adapt pr_err msg to reflect new state (-> connector is unkown)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v9:
> > > > > > - Fix leading semicolon found by kbuild semicolon.cocci
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v8:
> > > > > > - V4L2_CON_* -> V4L2_CONN_*
> > > > > > - tvnorms -> sdtv-standards
> > > > > > - adapt to new v4l2_fwnode_connector_analog member
> > > > > > - return error in case of V4L2_CONN_HDMI
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v7:
> > > > > > @Jacopo: I dropped your r b tag becuase of the amount of changes I
> > > > > > made..
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - drop unnecessary comments
> > > > > > - fix commet style
> > > > > > - s/v4l2_fwnode_connector_conv.name/v4l2_fwnode_connector_conv.compatible/
> > > > > > - make label size variable and drop V4L2_CONNECTOR_MAX_LABEL usage
> > > > > > - do not assign a default label in case of no label was specified
> > > > > > - remove useless /* fall through */ comments
> > > > > > - add support for N connector links
> > > > > > - rename local variables to be more meaningful
> > > > > > - adjust kernedoc
> > > > > > - add v4l2_fwnode_connector_free()
> > > > > > - improve error handling (use different error values)
> > > > > > - make use of pr_warn_once()
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v6:
> > > > > > - use unsigned count var
> > > > > > - fix comment and style issues
> > > > > > - place '/* fall through */' to correct places
> > > > > > - fix error handling and cleanup by releasing fwnode
> > > > > > - drop vga and dvi parsing support as those connectors are rarely used
> > > > > >   these days
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v5:
> > > > > > - s/strlcpy/strscpy/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v2-v4:
> > > > > > - nothing since the patch was squashed from series [1] into this
> > > > > >   series.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h           |  38 ++++++++
> > > > > >  2 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
> > > > > > index 3bd1888787eb..0bfa7cbf78df 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
> > > > > > @@ -595,6 +595,135 @@ void v4l2_fwnode_put_link(struct v4l2_fwnode_link *link)
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_fwnode_put_link);
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > +static const struct v4l2_fwnode_connector_conv {
> > > > > > +	enum v4l2_connector_type type;
> > > > > > +	const char *compatible;
> > > > > > +} connectors[] = {
> > > > > > +	{
> > > > > > +		.type = V4L2_CONN_COMPOSITE,
> > > > > > +		.compatible = "composite-video-connector",
> > > > > > +	}, {
> > > > > > +		.type = V4L2_CONN_SVIDEO,
> > > > > > +		.compatible = "svideo-connector",
> > > > > > +	},
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static enum v4l2_connector_type
> > > > > > +v4l2_fwnode_string_to_connector_type(const char *con_str)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	unsigned int i;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(connectors); i++)
> > > > > > +		if (!strcmp(con_str, connectors[i].compatible))
> > > > > > +			return connectors[i].type;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	return V4L2_CONN_UNKNOWN;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int
> > > > > > +v4l2_fwnode_connector_parse_analog(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > > > > > +				   struct v4l2_fwnode_connector *vc)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	u32 stds;
> > > > > > +	int ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "sdtv-standards", &stds);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* The property is optional. */
> > > > > > +	vc->connector.analog.sdtv_stds = ret ? V4L2_STD_ALL : stds;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +void v4l2_fwnode_connector_free(struct v4l2_fwnode_connector *connector)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	unsigned int i;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(connector))
> > > > > > +		return;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	for (i = 0; i < connector->nr_of_links; i++)
> > > > > > +		v4l2_fwnode_put_link(&connector->links[i]);
> > > > > > +	kfree(connector->links);
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please assign connector->links NULL here, and nr_of_links to zero.
> > > > 
> > > > Okay, I can do that.
> > > > 
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_fwnode_connector_free);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +int v4l2_fwnode_connector_alloc_parse(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > > > > > +				      struct v4l2_fwnode_connector *connector)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	struct fwnode_handle *remote_pp, *remote_ep;
> > > > > > +	const char *type_name;
> > > > > > +	unsigned int i = 0, ep_num = 0;
> > > > > > +	int err;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	memset(connector, 0, sizeof(*connector));
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	remote_pp = fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent(fwnode);
> > > > > 
> > > > > How do you know a remote endpoint is a connector, and not another device's
> > > > > endpoint?
> > > > 
> > > > Well, I think that the caller won't use this function if it isn't a
> > > > connector. If it helps I can check if the compatible of the remote ends
> > > > with "-connector".
> > > 
> > > The function is called by a driver. A driver shouldn't know what's at the
> > > other end of the graph arc; the information should come from the firmware
> > > instead.
> > > 
> > > On some board there could be another device where you have a connector now.
> > > 
> > > As the connector has its own compatible string, there could be a connector
> > > driver to tell this is actually a connector, even if there's nothing to
> > > control. It'd be a very tiny driver.
> > 
> > Yes I know a connector driver would be the best. This also have the
> > advantage to do drop the connector handling in each subdev driver.. But
> > unfortunately I haven't the time yet. Would it be okay for you too check
> > that the remote is a connector and if not to exit?
> 
> The current design is also problematic in the sense that it parses remote DT
> graph endpoints (as well as device nodes) that are not under the device's
> own scope.

You are right that is not good. Would it be okay with you to parse only
the local node so the caller must pass the connector node?

> I wonder what kind of changes would that require, and how much more
> difficult would the changes be to implement later on if a number of drivers
> uses the newly added APIs.
> 
> v4l2_fwnode_parse_endpoint() should be considered as well. This is the
> current API to parse endpoints. Could connectors be meaningfully parsed
> within v4l2_fwnode_parse_endpoint()?

I think v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse() isn't the correct place. Of course
it is a endpoint but I don't think that a connector should be placed
there. Currently the endpoint is mostly used to describe the connection
between the isp and a sensor. I think we shouldn't add something
unrelated just because it's an fw-endpoint. The connector just describes
who users can interact with the device. A connector isn't connected to a
chip using mipi or something else.

> What you're doing with connectors looks very much the same as what one would
> do with async sub-devices, and if this is re-implemented for connectors,
> there should be a good reason to do so.

I don't think that it has something to do with a async device because
connectors shouldn't disappear so there is no need to probe it async.
Also we shouldn't probe it async only because we can add a custom probe
parse handler and furthermore we can't fill the connector struct..

Regards,
  Marco

> -- 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux