Am 06.11.19 um 16:34 schrieb Rob Herring: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:07 AM Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring: >>> This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt >>> branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I >>> apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and >>> we >>> finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus' >>> tree). >> >> This series has dependencies for the Realtek-side RFC patches and is >> not yet ready to merge, so you can take this prep PATCH through your >> tree for v5.6 probably, or feel free to rebase/rework as you see fit - >> I'd just appreciate being credited at least via Reported-by. :) > > I was assuming the non-RFC patches are good to go, so I was going to > pick up 1, 2, and 7. Actually 1, 2 and 4 should be good to go; 7 if you fix the subject or if I respin. Also 6 if you can have someone check that no new properties will be needed for 470 (no Linux driver support yet). All but 1 assuming you'll be okay to add SoC-specific restrictions on clocks/resets/domains later, once we've fully figured it out (cf. cover letter for current errors - looking into power domains next). Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
