On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:07 AM Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring: > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > Instead of grouping alphabetically by third-party vendor, leading > > > to > > > one-element enums, sort by Mali model number, as done for Utgard. > > > > > > This already allows us to de-duplicate two "arm,mali-t760" sections > > > and > > > will make it easier to add new vendor compatibles. > > > > That was the intent. Not sure how I messed that up... > > > > This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt > > branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I > > apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and > > we > > finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus' > > tree). > > This series has dependencies for the Realtek-side RFC patches and is > not yet ready to merge, so you can take this prep PATCH through your > tree for v5.6 probably, or feel free to rebase/rework as you see fit - > I'd just appreciate being credited at least via Reported-by. :) I was assuming the non-RFC patches are good to go, so I was going to pick up 1, 2, and 7. Rob
