Hello Linus, On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 16:05 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:48 PM Vaittinen, Matti > <Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Good initiative (and I will see a ton of janitorial patches as a > > > result of this...) > > > > I have somewhere near 62 patches waiting to be sent =) They're > > pretty > > small but I'd appreciate thorough review as they're mostly > > untested... > > Do you mind receiving them all in one go? Or do you think I should > > send > > the series in smaller chuncks? > > I would be fine with one patch introducing the defines and then > one big patch switching everybody and their dog over to using > these definitions. > > I usually keep to a patch being "one technical step" and it is > clearly (IMO) one step to introduce the defines and one step > to make use of it in all legacy drivers. > > It's late in the kernel cycle but this particular part (the defines > and switching over old driver to use it) I'd be happy > to merge for v5.5. I'll prepare one patch for defines and one large patch for driver changes on top of GPIO tree then. I'll leave out the last one 62/62 - it can be applied later if it is considered a good idea - I'd appreciate if you / Bartosz had the time to check it though. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
