* Graeme Smecher <gsmecher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [191004 23:53]:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 2019-10-03 6:45 p.m., Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > According to
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.txt,
> > i2c-mux-idle-disconnect is a property of a parent node since it
> > pertains to the mux/switch as a whole, so move it there and drop all
> > of the concurrences in child nodes.
> >
> > Fixes: d031773169df ("ARM: dts: Adds device tree file for McGill's IceBoard, based on TI AM3874")
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Benoît Cousson <bcousson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Graeme Smecher <gsmecher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---
> >
> > This is purely a drive-by fix, since it concerns the HW I've never
> > heard of before. However I was working with PCA9548
> > (vf610-zii-scu4-aib is my HW) and looking at various users in the
> > kernel, when this code caught my eye. Apologies for the noise if this
> > fix is somehow bogus.
> >
> > In case that it matters this patch is based on top of 5.4-rc1.
>
> Thanks! We do have I2C address collisions on downstream bus segments, so
> keeping these segments isolated is important. I'm surprised this patch
> was necessary and happy to see it.
>
> Lightly tested on 5.3.
>
> Tested-by: Graeme Smecher <gsmecher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applying into fixes thanks.
Tony
