Hi,
On 25.04.2014 03:16, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and change parameter of smc call
of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for Exynos4212.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
index 932129e..aa01c42 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include <mach/map.h>
+#include <plat/cpu.h>
+
#include "smc.h"
static int exynos_do_idle(void)
@@ -28,13 +30,24 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
{
+ /*
+ * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
+ * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
+ * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
+ */
+ if (soc_is_exynos4212())
+ cpu = 0;
+
exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
return 0;
}
static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
{
- void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c + 4*cpu;
+ void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
+
+ if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
+ boot_reg += 4*cpu;
__raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
return 0;
This patch should be applied independently of Exynos3250 support.
Kukjin, what do you think?
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
