> Am 16.09.2019 um 21:20 schrieb Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 2:15 PM H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> Am 16.09.2019 um 20:12 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> >> " for 56000000.sgx on minor 1" is suspect. >> IMHO, it should have to be " for 5600fe00.sgx on minor 1" >> But anyways this is a big step forwards having giving me three different >> platforms for testing and comparisons. > > I can try to help again with the SGX once I can get the LCD stuff > working. At some point, the panel-dpi driver was removed, and I am > struggling to get my LCD's back. We had similar issues when that happened... > Until I can get the LCD's fully > function, I can't test the SGX. I got a little distracted with the > OPP stuff you did and the thermal throttling. Same for me. I just started over today I have pushed my latest trees (where this now working-for-me patch is included) to https://github.com/openpvrsgx-devgroup/linux_openpvrsgx/branches/active This branch contains everything on top of v5.3: https://github.com/openpvrsgx-devgroup/linux_openpvrsgx/commits/letux-pvr Maybe for further more general SGX discussion we should now start a new mail thread or continue the "Lay common foundation to make PVR/SGX work ...". BR, Nikolaus
