On 24 April 2014 12:57, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 24 April 2014 12:17, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> I have looked though the patches up until patch 33 and this is clearly >> >> a nice piece of clean-up /fixes work for sdhci. Besides my minor >> >> comments per patch, I don't have any objections code-review wise to >> >> proceed merging them. >> >> >> >> I have also tried to applied them on Chris' mmc-next branch, >> >> unfortunate it fails at patch 23, so it would be nice to get a >> >> re-based patchset for the mmc-next branch. >> > >> > I /could/ rebase it but then I wouldn't be able to produce the patch >> > sets/patches for others [*] (such as the Novena project) to derive >> > their kernel tree from my iMX6 patch set. >> > >> > What I'd prefer is to keep the patch set intact, and provide Chris >> > with a pull request for it up to patch 33, which would need a >> > conflict fixed - and this would mean that I can be sure that what >> > I'm testing, and what I'm distributing is what Chris will also be >> > submitting. >> >> Whether there are more than one conflict, I don't know. I just stopped >> at patch 23. >> >> Moreover, there are other patches for sdhci that have been posted and >> being discussed. In principle, we then need to put all these on hold >> to prevent further conflicts. I guess that doable, as long as we don't >> to that for too long. Maybe Chris have some more thoughts how to >> handle this!? > > This is nothing new or unexpected - it was last posted back in February, > and I elected that it should be held off until after the last merge > window. > > Unfortunately, I didn't have time to post it immediately after the merge > window closed, partly because it needed to be rebased on top of tglx's > IRQ changes on which it depends. I was carrying those as separate commits > to the ones Thomas was carrying in his tree - and in the event, Thomas had > modified his patches slightly between sending me copies of them and the > versions he sent during the merge window. Okay, so let's keep up the frequency here then. I only had some minor comments, please fix them and send a v2. How about if I resolve the conflicts and send the pull request to Chris? I suppose it makes life a bit easier for Chris. Kind regards Ulf Hansson > > -- > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly > improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
