Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-08-26 05:14:50) > With clock parent data scheme we must specify the parent clocks for the > rpmhcc nodes. So describe the parent clock for rpmhcc in the bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt > index 3c007653da31..8b97968f9c88 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt > @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ Required properties : > - compatible : shall contain "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk" > > - #clock-cells : must contain 1 > +- clocks: a list of phandles and clock-specifier pairs, > + one for each entry in clock-names. > +- clock-names: Parent board clock: "xo". Ok. xo is fine!
