Hi Tony, On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 06:16 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [190903 08:15]: > > On 03/09/2019 11:10, Rob Herring wrote: > > > I prefer that bindings be complete as possible even if driver support > > > is not there yet. Adding power domain support may only mean adding > > > '#power-domain-cells'. > > > > > > The location is fine then. > > > > Yeah, I assume just adding power-domain-cells should be enough. I am not too > > sure before I start trying this out though so did not want to add it yet. > > Should we call the device tree node name power-controller instead of > reset controller though? Most of the PRM instances do not have a > separate rstctrl reset control functionality. > > Anybody got better any better naming in mind? power-controller seems fine to me, that is their primary function. regards Philipp
