Re: [PATCHv3 01/10] dt-bindings: omap: add new binding for PRM instances

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [190903 08:15]:
> On 03/09/2019 11:10, Rob Herring wrote:
> > I prefer that bindings be complete as possible even if driver support
> > is not there yet. Adding power domain support may only mean adding
> > '#power-domain-cells'.
> > 
> > The location is fine then.
> 
> Yeah, I assume just adding power-domain-cells should be enough. I am not too
> sure before I start trying this out though so did not want to add it yet.

Should we call the device tree node name power-controller instead of
reset controller though? Most of the PRM instances do not have a
separate rstctrl reset control functionality.

Anybody got better any better naming in mind?

Regards,

Tony





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux