On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 10:13 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:46:44AM +0000, Chris Packham wrote: > > Hi Russell, > > > > On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 11:50 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:46:21AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux > > > admin wrote: > > > > I can't apply this series - this file does not exist in my tree, > > > > and > > > > from what git tells me, it never has existed. Maybe it's in > > > > someone > > > > elses tree? > > > > > > I think the file is in my tree, just as arch/arm/mm/cache-aurora-l2.h > > > which is where it has been since it was originally submitted in 2012. > > > > Sorry there is a missing patch that moves it next to the > > hardware/cache-*.h. I can send the missing patch or I can re-send the > > whole series. If I do send the whole series do you want me to rebase it > > against a particular tag/tree? > > Just send the single patch to the patch tracker - having it against > 5.3-rc is fine (I don't think anything has changed for a long time > with that file.) Done https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8902/1 I'm still not entirely sure what to put for the KernelVersion tag. In hindsight think I misinterpreted your comment above and set it to 5.3rc (where you meant a series based on 5.3-rcX should apply cleanly). It probably should have been next or master because it's way past the merge window for 5.3.
