On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 10:42 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 23/08/2019 08:21, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 11:31 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On 22/08/2019 10:26, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > this is a second spin of a patch set that adds support for the Marvell > > > > MMP3 processor. MMP3 is used in OLPC XO-4 laptops, Panasonic Toughpad > > > > FZ-A1 tablet and Dell Wyse 3020 Tx0D thin clients. > > > > > > > > Compared to v1, there's a handful of fixes in response to reviews. Patch > > > > 02/20 is new. Details in individual patches. > > > > > > > > Apart from the adjustments in mach-mmp/, the patch makes necessary > > > > changes to the irqchip driver and adds an USB2 PHY driver. The latter > > > > has a dependency on the mach-mmp/ changes, so it can't be submitted > > > > separately. > > > > > > > > The patch set has been tested to work on Wyse Tx0D and not ruin MMP2 > > > > support on XO-1.75. > > > > > > How do you want this series to be merged? I'm happy to take the irqchip > > > related patches as well as the corresponding DT change (once reviewed) > > > through my tree. > > > > I was hoping for the Arm SoC tree, because there are some dependencies > > (MMP3 USB PHY depends on MMP3 SoC). > > > > That said, the irqchip patches are rather independent and the only > > downside of them going in via a different tree will be that the other > > tree that will lack them won't boot on MMP3 (things will compile > > though). I don't know if that's okay. What's typically done in cases > > like these? > > I usually take the irqchip patches that can be built standalone (without > dependency on header files, for example). If you want them to go via > another tree, stick my > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > on patches #6 through #9. Actually, please go ahead and pick the irqchip patches into your tree. The rest of the patch set may need a couple more spins, and it will be nice if it gets shorter. Thank you Lubo
