On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 15:36 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 22/08/2019 21:26:01+0800, Ran Bi wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 14:46 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > On 22/08/2019 20:34:14+0800, Ran Bi wrote: > > > > > > + /* RTC need POWERKEY1/2 match, then goto normal work mode */ > > > > > > + mt2712_writel(rtc, MT2712_POWERKEY1, MT2712_POWERKEY1_KEY); > > > > > > + mt2712_writel(rtc, MT2712_POWERKEY2, MT2712_POWERKEY2_KEY); > > > > > > > > > > This should be written when setting the time after power was lost. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose we can move this into mt2712_rtc_read_time function's "if > > > > (p1 != MT2712_POWERKEY1_KEY || p2 != MT2712_POWERKEY2_KEY)" condition > > > > which will be added at next patch. We need additional flag to mark this > > > > condition or another if condition in mt2712_rtc_set_time fucntion if we > > > > put these code in mt2712_rtc_set_time function. > > > > > > > > > > It is fine to test both in read_time and in set_time. > > > > > > > Do you mean that we can test powerkey and then set powerkey both in > > read_time and in set_time? > > > > I mean that can test in read_time and test and set in set_time > > Ok, I will change it at next patch. Best Regards, Ran
