On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:46:11PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-08-16 20:34:22) > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:01:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-07-05 08:14:36) > > > > +It is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings as "osc". > > > > + > > > > +Example: > > > > + > > > > + clk: clock-controller@800 { > > > > + compatible = "bitmain,bm1880-clk"; > > > > + reg = <0xe8 0x0c>,<0x800 0xb0>; > > > > > > It looks weird still. What hardware module is this actually part of? > > > Some larger power manager block? > > > > > > > These are all part of the sysctrl block (clock + pinctrl + reset) and the > > register domains got split between system and pll. > > > > And that can't be one node that probes the clk, pinctrl, and reset > drivers from C code? It is not a MFD for sure. It's just grouping of the register domains together. Thanks, Mani >