Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-08-16 20:34:22)
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:01:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-07-05 08:14:36)
> > > +It is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings as "osc".
> > > +
> > > +Example:
> > > +
> > > + clk: clock-controller@800 {
> > > + compatible = "bitmain,bm1880-clk";
> > > + reg = <0xe8 0x0c>,<0x800 0xb0>;
> >
> > It looks weird still. What hardware module is this actually part of?
> > Some larger power manager block?
> >
>
> These are all part of the sysctrl block (clock + pinctrl + reset) and the
> register domains got split between system and pll.
>
And that can't be one node that probes the clk, pinctrl, and reset
drivers from C code?
