> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2019年8月15日 20:51
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx; gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; kishon@xxxxxx;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@xxxxxxx>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@xxxxxxx>;
> Roy Zang <roy.zang@xxxxxxx>; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting
> capability with different PEX
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
> > capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
> > capability, make it more flexible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28
> > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >
> > struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > };
> >
> > #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > @@ -40,25 +41,26 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > { },
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
> > - .linkup_notifier = false,
> > - .msi_capable = true,
> > - .msix_capable = false,
> > -};
> > -
> > static const struct pci_epc_features* ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct
> > dw_pcie_ep *ep) {
> > - return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
> > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > +
> > + return pcie->ls_epc;
> > }
> >
> > static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) {
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > enum pci_barno bar;
> >
> > for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
> > dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> > +
> > + pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
> > + pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
> > }
> >
> > static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, @@
> > -118,6 +120,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> > + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > struct resource *dbi_base;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > if (!pci)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!ls_epc)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> "regs");
> > pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > @@ -139,6 +146,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > pcie->pci = pci;
> >
> > + ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
> > + ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
> > + ls_epc->msix_capable = true,
>
> As [msi,msix]_capable is shortly set from ls_pcie_ep_init - is there any reason
> to set them here (to potentially incorrect values)?
This is a INIT value, maybe false is better for msi_capable and msix_capable,
of course, we don't need to set it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Murray
>
> > + ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > +
> > + pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > +
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> >
> > ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > --
> > 2.9.5
> >
