On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather > > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree? > > > > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the > > pinctrl tree, yes. > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the > > conflicts in my tree.) > > Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't > really mind > where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it > if I split it up. Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series. Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3? Andrew
