Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:28 PM Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The two Ethernet ports on the RZA2MEVB development board are labeled
> > "Ether1" and "Ether2". Reflect this numbering in the ethernet aliases.
>
> However, the channels are labeled as ETHERC0 and ETHERC1 in the hardware
> manual.
>
> So I guess my question is, in general, is the board specific Device Tree
> supposed to describe what is on the SoC? Or on the board silk screen?
AFAIK the aliases numbering is supposed to match the board or case labels.
> Maybe this is like "COM1" is labeled on PC motherboard and we expect it
> to show up as /dev/ttyS0 regardless of what physical serial port it is
> connected to.
Those pesky FORTRAN programmers, counting from 1 ;-)
On Koelsch (and Salvator-X(S)), they are called "debug0" and "debug1".
These used to be /dev/ttySC6 and /dev/ttySC7, but got renamed in
commit 1f75cdac773bc9c9 ("ARM: shmobile: koelsch: Rename SCIF[01] serial
ports to ttySC[01]").
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
