Hello Andrew, On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 6:57 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:23:45PM +0530, Sagar Kadam wrote: > > > +ð0 { > > > + status = "okay"; > > > + phy-mode = "gmii"; > > > + phy-handle = <&phy1>; > > > + phy1: ethernet-phy@0 { > > > + reg = <0>; > > > + }; > > Hi Sagar > > Is there a good reason to call it phy1? Is there a phy0? > Sorry for the delayed response. There is a single phy, so yes phy0 is a better name. Thank you for pointing this out. Thanks & Regards, Sagar Kadam > Thanks > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv