On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 02:53PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Hi Sören, > > Am Freitag, den 11.04.2014, 08:54 -0700 schrieb Sören Brinkmann: > > On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 04:59PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > > This is likely a copy-and-paste error from the > > > ARM GIC documentation, that has already been fixed. > > > > > > address-cells should have been set to 0, as with the size > > > cells. As having those properties set to 0 is the > > > same thing as not specifying them, drop them completely. > > > > Isn't this property inherited from the parent node, requiring to > > actually set them to 0 to comply with the docs? > > > > No, it isn't. From ePAPR v1.1 section 2.3.5: > "The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not inherited from > ancestors in the device tree. They shall be explicitly defined." Thanks, you're right. I didn't know that document yet. I have some reading to do. Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
