Hi Sören, Am Freitag, den 11.04.2014, 08:54 -0700 schrieb Sören Brinkmann: > On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 04:59PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > This is likely a copy-and-paste error from the > > ARM GIC documentation, that has already been fixed. > > > > address-cells should have been set to 0, as with the size > > cells. As having those properties set to 0 is the > > same thing as not specifying them, drop them completely. > > Isn't this property inherited from the parent node, requiring to > actually set them to 0 to comply with the docs? > No, it isn't. From ePAPR v1.1 section 2.3.5: "The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not inherited from ancestors in the device tree. They shall be explicitly defined." Regards, Lucas -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
