On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:00:36AM +0000, Aisheng Dong wrote: > > From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2019 5:04 AM > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:04 AM <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Add binding doc for i.MX8MN pinctrl driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx> > > > > Looks mostly OK to me, but I'd like the maintainers to review, so Dong et al > > please look at this! > > > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible: "fsl,imx8mn-iomuxc" > > > > So should this not be "nxp,imx8mn-iomuxc" > > or "nxp,freescale-imx8mn-iomuxc" or something these days? The vendor name > > is nxp is it not. > > > > I was complaining to the DT maintainers at one point that these companies > > seem to buy each other left and right so this vendor nomenclature is dubious, > > but I guess at least it should reflect the vendor that produced the chip or > > something. > > > > If everyone is happy with "fsl,*" I will not complain though. > > (i.e. if the maintainers ACK it.) > > We preferred to keep "fsl,*" for Freescale i.MX product line according to last discussion. > And we already did this way for most i.MX devices. +1 We do not see serious problem with 'fsl' prefix, so would rather stay with it. Shawn
