On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:09:12AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote: > Hi, Shawn > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 2:00 PM > > To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; wim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > festevam@xxxxxxxxx; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; > > ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx; Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>; Peng Fan > > <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V4 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Move watchdog > > node into scu node > > > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:06:28AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote: > > > Hi, Shawn > > > The driver and binding doc are already reviewed and waiting for DT > > patch, will you help review this DT patch? > > > > I'm fine with it. Should I just pick this patch up, or is there any dependency > > we need to handle? > > No dependency, it just makes more sense to move the node into SCU node as it is NOW depending on SCU > driver. Once you pick up this patch Just applied. > (and maybe the dt-binding patch as well?), It makes more sense to have it go through watchdog tree. Shawn > I will notify the watchdog > maintainer to pick up the watchdog patch in this series.
