From: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:34:22 +0000 > This adds support for the mv88e6250 chip. Initially based on the > mv88e6240, this time around, I've been through each ->ops callback and > checked that it makes sense, either replacing with a 6250 specific > variant or dropping it if no equivalent functionality seems to exist > for the 6250. Along the way, I found a few oddities in the existing > code, mostly sent as separate patches/questions. > > The one relevant to the 6250 is the ieee_pri_map callback, where the > existing mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map() is actually wrong for many of the > existing users. I've put the mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map() patch first > in case some of the existing chips get switched over to use that and > it is deemed important enough for -stable. ... Series applied, thanks.
