On 6/3/2019 11:50 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
the iommu API level:
[0000000000000038] user address but active_mm is swapper
Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 7 PID: 70 Comm: kworker/7:1 Tainted: G W 4.19.3 #90
Hardware name: xxx (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 80c00009 (Nzcv daif +PAN +UAO)
pc : iommu_dma_map_sg+0x7c/0x2c8
lr : iommu_dma_map_sg+0x40/0x2c8
sp : ffffff80095eb4f0
x29: ffffff80095eb4f0 x28: 0000000000000000
x27: ffffffc0f9431578 x26: 0000000000000000
x25: 00000000ffffffff x24: 0000000000000003
x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffffffc0fa9ac010
x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffffffc0fab40980
x19: ffffffc0fab40980 x18: 0000000000000003
x17: 00000000000001c4 x16: 0000000000000007
x15: 000000000000000e x14: ffffffffffffffff
x13: ffff000000000000 x12: 0000000000000028
x11: 0101010101010101 x10: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f
x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffffffc0fab409a0
x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000002
x5 : 0000000100000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000000000000002
x1 : ffffffc0f9431578 x0 : 0000000000000000
Process kworker/7:1 (pid: 70, stack limit = 0x0000000017d08ffb)
Call trace:
iommu_dma_map_sg+0x7c/0x2c8
__iommu_map_sg_attrs+0x70/0x84
get_pages+0x170/0x1e8
msm_gem_get_iova+0x8c/0x128
_msm_gem_kernel_new+0x6c/0xc8
msm_gem_kernel_new+0x4c/0x58
dsi_tx_buf_alloc_6g+0x4c/0x8c
msm_dsi_host_modeset_init+0xc8/0x108
msm_dsi_modeset_init+0x54/0x18c
_dpu_kms_drm_obj_init+0x430/0x474
dpu_kms_hw_init+0x5f8/0x6b4
msm_drm_bind+0x360/0x6c8
try_to_bring_up_master.part.7+0x28/0x70
component_master_add_with_match+0xe8/0x124
msm_pdev_probe+0x294/0x2b4
platform_drv_probe+0x58/0xa4
really_probe+0x150/0x294
driver_probe_device+0xac/0xe8
__device_attach_driver+0xa4/0xb4
bus_for_each_drv+0x98/0xc8
__device_attach+0xac/0x12c
device_initial_probe+0x24/0x30
bus_probe_device+0x38/0x98
deferred_probe_work_func+0x78/0xa4
process_one_work+0x24c/0x3dc
worker_thread+0x280/0x360
kthread+0x134/0x13c
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
Code: d2800004 91000725 6b17039f 5400048a (f9401f40)
---[ end trace f22dda57f3648e2c ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
Kernel Offset: disabled
CPU features: 0x0,22802a18
Memory Limit: none
The problem is that when drm/msm does it's own iommu_attach_device(),
now the domain returned by iommu_get_domain_for_dev() is drm/msm's
domain, and it doesn't have domain->iova_cookie.
We kind of avoided this problem prior to sdm845/dpu because the iommu
was attached to the mdp node in dt, which is a child of the toplevel
mdss node (which corresponds to the dev passed in dma_map_sg()). But
with sdm845, now the iommu is attached at the mdss level so we hit the
iommu_dma_ops in dma_map_sg().
But auto allocating/attaching a domain before the driver is probed was
already a blocking problem for enabling per-context pagetables for the
GPU. This problem is also now solved with this patch.
Fixes: 97890ba9289c dma-mapping: detect and configure IOMMU in of_dma_configure
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
---
This is an alternative/replacement for [1]. What it lacks in elegance
it makes up for in practicality ;-)
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/264930/
drivers/of/device.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
index 5957cd4fa262..15ffee00fb22 100644
--- a/drivers/of/device.c
+++ b/drivers/of/device.c
@@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ int of_device_add(struct platform_device *ofdev)
return device_add(&ofdev->dev);
}
+static const struct of_device_id iommu_blacklist[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,mdp4" },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,mdss" },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mdss" },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,adreno" },
+ {}
+};
Not completely clear to whether this is still needed or not, but this
really won't scale. Why can't the driver for these devices override
whatever has been setup by default?
fwiw, at the moment it is not needed, but it will become needed again
to implement per-context pagetables (although I suppose for this we
only need to blacklist qcom,adreno and not also the display nodes).
So, another case I've come across, on the display side.. I'm working
on handling the case where bootloader enables display (and takes iommu
out of reset).. as soon as DMA domain gets attached we get iommu
faults, because bootloader has already configured display for scanout.
Unfortunately this all happens before actual driver is probed and has
a chance to intervene.
Things are bad for MTP sdm845 too where the bootloader sets up iommu to
display splash screen, and when the kernel resets the iommu, the mappings go
for a toss resulting in fatal faults.
Bjorn was working on something recently to address this. Adding him to
the thread.
Best regards
Vivek
It's rather unfortunate that we tried to be clever rather than just
making drivers call some function to opt-in to the hookup of dma iommu
ops :-(
I think it still works for the 90% of cases and if 10% needs some
explicit work in the drivers, that's better than requiring 100% of the
drivers to do things manually.
Adding Marek who had the same problem on Exynos.
Best regards,
Tomasz
BR,
-R
The reason is that in the current state the core code creates the
first domain before the driver has a chance to intervene and tell it
not to. And this results that driver ends up using a different
context bank on the iommu than what the firmware expects.
I guess the alternative is to put some property in DT.. but that
doesn't really feel right. I guess there aren't really many (or any?)
other drivers that have this specific problem, so I don't really
expect it to be a scaling problem.
Yeah, it's a bit ugly, but I'll take a small ugly working hack, over
elegant but non-working any day ;-)... but if someone has a better
idea then I'm all ears.
BR,
-R
