On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 21:48:14 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Liviu Dudau <liviu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:02:41AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> >> >> struct pci_host_bridge {
>> >> >> int domain;
>> >> >> int node;
>> >> >> struct device *dev;
>> >> >> struct pci_ops *ops;
>> >> >> struct list_head resources;
>> >> >> void *sysdata;
>> >> >> struct pci_bus *bus; /* filled in by core, not by arch */
>> >> >> ... /* other existing contents managed by core */
>> >> >> };
>> >> >>
>> >> >> struct pci_bus *pci_scan_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge);
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm really reluctant to give the arches more rope to hang themselves.
>> >>
>> >> If you mean the sysdata pointer is rope to hang themselves, I think it
>> >> would be great it we didn't need sysdata at all. But I think it would
>> >> be a huge amount of work to get rid of it completely, and keeping it
>> >> would let us work at that incrementally.
>> >
>> > Agree. But then your suggestion was to wrap sysdata inside another structure,
>> > which to me constitutes additional rope.
>>
>> I'll ponder this more, but I don't see your point here yet. The arch
>> already supplies a sysdata pointer to pci_scan_root_bus(), and we
>> stash it in every struct pci_bus already. My idea was just to pass it
>> in differently, as a structure member rather than a separate argument.
>> (And I'm not completely attached to my proposal; it was only to
>> illustrate my concern about the explosion of interfaces if we have to
>> add *_domain(), *_node(), etc.)
>
> As a minor variation of your suggestion, how about passing in a pointer
> to struct pci_host_bridge, and embed that within its own private
> structure? I think this is closer to how a lot of other subsystems
> do the abstraction.
I'm not sure I'm following you; you mean the arch-specific sysdata
structure would contain a pointer to struct pci_host_bridge?
I have to admit that I'm not up on how other subsystems handle this
sort of abstraction. Do you have any pointers to good examples that I
can study?
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
