> + Lee, Marek > > Hi Huang, > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:39:40PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:13:51PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:37:34PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > > > Could you please review this patch set? I really hope it can be merged > > > as soon as possibel. But now, the patch set has stalled for a long time. > > > > I'm sorry for the delay. Others are in the same position of delay (e.g., > > Lee's SPI-NOR driver), because I simply have not had the time to really > > devote this the attention it deserves, especially considering how it > > rearchitects such an important, commonly-used driver. > > > > Nonetheless, I will try to give your patches some more attention soon. > > > > > Since you have pushed the patches for m25p80.c, i have to rebase this > > > patch set again and again... > > > > You mean locally? I promise you, I can handle rebasing on my reviewing > > end for small one-line conflicts like new chip IDs, so don't rebase and > > resend simply for that. Unless I find substantive things that you should > > change, I'd only expect at most one more rebase to be necessary. > > Unfortunately, I did not get the time to review and test this > sufficiently for the 3.15 merge window, but to avoid further delay, I've > queued it up in l2-mtd.git [1] under its own branch for now. I rebased > it myself, to accommodate for changes to m25p80.c since your submission. > Please take a look at the branch. > > If all goes well, I should merge the spinor branch into master some time > after the 3.15 merge window closes, so it will get linux-next testing. > For any additional comments/corrections (I have a few), please just > submit patches on top, rather than resending the whole series. > > Marek, what was your opinion on this series? Last response I saw was > "looking good"; is that an Ack? Or did you have any more gating > requests? > > Personally, I think it looks ready enough, and it's better to merge this > than not. I was able to test with my platforms, with no regression. > > Lee, I have a few patches that do some trivial unification of your ST > SPI FSM driver and the SPI-NOR framework. I plan to send these out > soon, and I will begin applying any ST-FSM patches to the same spinor > branch along with Huang's code. I hope that you can spend some effort on > improving integration within the next few months in preparation for > 3.16, when I expect this to all go upstream. I certainly plan to. Although, I'm up to my neck in the ST BCH NAND driver at the moment. Trying to re-spin something that'll be accepted i.e. more intensive use of the framework. Quick question, is there a chat medium for MTD? Somewhere for quick-fire questions i.e. an IRC channel or similar? > [1] branch spinor, at http://git.infradead.org/l2-mtd.git -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
