On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:43:45AM +0200, luca@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On May 20, 2019 1:07:42 PM GMT+02:00, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> >> Add a node describing the KEYADC on the A64.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> index 7734f70e1057..dc1bf8c1afb5 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> @@ -704,6 +704,13 @@
> >> status = "disabled";
> >> };
> >>
> >> + lradc: lradc@1c21800 {
> >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-keys";
> >> + reg = <0x01c21800 0x100>;
> >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> + status = "disabled";
> >> + };
> >> +
> >
> >The controller is pretty different on the A64 compared to the A10. The
> >A10 has two channels for example, while the A64 has only one.
> >
> >It looks like the one in the A83t though, so you can use that
> >compatible instead.
>
> Looking at the patch for the A83t, the only difference is that it
> uses a 3/4 instead of a 2/3 voltage divider, nothing is changed with
> the channels.
I guess you can reuse the A83t compatible here then, and a more
specific a64 compatible in case we ever need to fix this.
> But I'm also not sure which one (or a different one)
> is used from looking at the "A64 User Manual".
I'm sorry, what are you referring to with "one" in that sentence?
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
